Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Redmayne Bentley Stockbrokers Logo
Sponsored by
Yorkshire’s Oldest and Award-Winning Stockbroker
Share Dealing and Investment Management Services
 
 
Saturday, 22nd November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Iceland tries to take heat out of bank row



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 11 October 2008
Iceland's prime minister sought to draw a line under the bitter spat with Gordon Brown last night by insisting they were now working together to deal with the banking crisis.

Mr Geir Haarde said he was cooperating "amicably" with the UK, and that his country would "honour its obligations".

However, he again refused to guarantee that British taxpayers hit by the collapse of the Icelandic banking sector would get their m
oney back.

Mr Haarde was speaking after Treasury officials arrived in Reykjavik for talks to try and settle the dispute, which involves some £1bn of local council money as well as billions more from small investors.

More than £70m of Yorkshire taxpayers' money is caught up in the country's banking collapse.

It also emerged yesterday that the Chelsea Building Society has some £55m invested in the troubled country, while charities are thought to have more than £120m tied up. Two NHS Trusts – Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust in Manchester – stand to lose around £2m.

The Iceland PM had previously reacted angrily over the use of anti-terror laws to freeze Icelandic bank assets in the UK, branding it a "completely unfriendly act" and blaming Britain for the collapse.

But Mr Haarde struck a more positive note last night, telling a press conference that he had now received a letter from Mr Brown outlining his position.

"We will now be able to start working together to find a solution," he said. "We will honour our obligations. We may need some support from UK authorities in order to do that in a proper way."

He said the "strong words" from Mr Brown – who has described Iceland's behaviour as "totally unacceptable" and threatened legal action to recoup cash – would "never help" the situation.

Downing Street confirmed that the Treasury delegation – which included officials from the Bank of England and the Financial Services Authority – was in Reykjavik.

Mr Brown's spokesman said they hoped now to work "constructively and cooperatively" with the Icelandic authorities. However he strongly defended the Government's action in freezing the Icelandic assets.

"The Prime Minister made clear, as is the case, that the behaviour of the Icelandic authorities had been unacceptable," he said.

"We had found it very difficult to get information from them. They had indicated that they would be giving preferential treatment to domestic creditors over overseas creditors."

The South Yorkshire Pension Authority, which administers a fund for all councils in the Riding, said it has £18.5m in Iceland and that it may "take some time" to know how secure the money is – but that it will have no affect on pensions "whatever the outcome".

Wakefield Council has £9m in Icelandic accounts, Bassetlaw £8m, North East Lincolnshire £7m, North Lincolnshire, £5.5m, Rotherham £3.75m, Doncaster £3m and Kirklees £1m.

West Yorkshire Police Authority has £6m, Humberside Police Authority £5.57m and South Yorkshire Passenger Transport Executive £6m.

Private companies are thought to have in excess of £10bn trapped in Icelandic accounts.

City Minister Paul Myners has also met charity group leaders to discuss the estimated £120m they have tied up in Iceland.

Speaking after the meeting, Charities Aid Foundation chief executive John Low said: "They gave reassurance they would do their best to help but there was not any guarantee, as we would have liked."

The charity with the largest amount invested in Icelandic banks known to the public so far is Cats Protection. It confirmed earlier that it had £11.2m of deposits in Kaupthing Singer & Friedlander (KSF). A spokeswoman said it would have "no impact at all on the charity's day-to-day operations".

A spokesman for Monitor, the regulator overseeing the 107 NHS foundation trusts in England, said services would be unaffected.



The full article contains 636 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 11 October 2008 9:36 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Yorkshire
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Claudius,

Hedon 22/10/2008 15:29:25
Each year, our local authorities send out tax demands which specify an amount payable to the appropriate police authority: presently, my contribution to the Humberside Police stands at £138.94.

Only days ago, the Humberside Police Authority released two significant statements:

First, that it has more than £5 million of public money invested with an Icelandic bank.

Second, that it expects to employ more civilians than police officers by the year 2013.

A common complaint against the police is that they fail to respond when called to incidents. Not all of these incidents are trivial. When criticised, the usual explanation offered by “a spokesman” is that no officer was available.

But if there are too few officers then why is the Humberside Police Authority investing more than £5 million of public funds with an Icelandic bank, instead of using the funds made available to provide the personnel it obviously requires?

The police also argue that the time officers are able to spend on our streets is greatly reduced by over-elaborate (or entirely useless) paperwork. In which case, these tasks need to be modified or discontinued - not simply given to and perpetuated by non-operational staff.

Members of the public have made clear their preference for having adequate numbers of properly trained PCs (and WPCs) on the streets.

But evidently, police authorities that hoard public funds in bank accounts and prefer to employ more civilians than qualified officers have different priorities.

Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.